← Back to blog Growth Stage

The Series A Reporting Crisis: Why Your Data Breaks at $3M ARR and How to Fix It

There's a moment every scale-up hits where the data breaks. Usually between $3M and $7M ARR.

There’s a moment every scale-up hits — usually somewhere between $3M and $7M ARR — where the data breaks. Not dramatically. Quietly. The metrics you used to track in a spreadsheet now take a week to compile. Your Stripe MRR doesn’t match your CRM. Nobody trusts the churn number. Every board meeting starts with an argument about which dashboard is right.

If this sounds familiar, you’re not behind. You’re exactly on schedule. Every scale-up goes through this. The question is how long you let it slow you down.

Why $3M ARR is where it falls apart

Pre-product-market fit, data is manageable. You have 20–50 customers, one or two tools, and the founder can keep everything in their head. You might track MRR in a spreadsheet. It works.

Then you hit PMF and start scaling. The tool stack multiplies: Stripe for billing, Salesforce or HubSpot for CRM, Intercom for support, Segment for analytics, maybe a product database, a marketing platform, a finance tool. Each one becomes a source of truth for something different, and none of them agree with each other.

At $3M ARR, most companies have 6–12 tools holding customer data. By $5M, it’s often more. Each tool was added to solve a specific problem, and each one works well in isolation. The crisis is in the connections — or rather, the lack of them.

The five symptoms

1. Your MRR number depends on who you ask

Finance pulls from Stripe. Sales pulls from Salesforce. The CEO’s spreadsheet says something else. The discrepancies are small at first — a few thousand here or there — but they compound. By the time you’re preparing for your Series B, you realise nobody actually knows the real number.

This happens because subscriptions get changed in billing without updating the CRM, discounts are applied inconsistently, and trial conversions fall through the cracks between systems.

2. Churn is a surprise

A customer cancels and everyone asks “why didn’t we see this coming?” The signals were there — usage dropped three months ago, support tickets spiked, the champion left — but each signal lived in a different tool. Nobody connected the dots until the cancellation email arrived.

3. Every data question is a project

“What’s our NRR by cohort?” should take 30 seconds. Instead, it takes a data pull from billing, a cross-reference with the CRM, manual categorisation of revenue changes, and a week of someone’s time. The answer arrives after the decision has already been made.

4. You’re hiring to solve a data problem

The instinct is to throw people at it. Hire a GTM engineer. Hire a data analyst. Hire a RevOps lead. Each hire helps, but each one also adds complexity — new tools, new processes, new handoffs. You end up with a team spending 60% of their time on ad-hoc data requests and 40% building systems that break when the next tool gets added.

5. Board prep is a fire drill

Every quarter, someone spends a week pulling numbers, reconciling discrepancies, building charts, and hoping the metrics hold up under investor scrutiny. The process is manual, stressful, and the numbers are often stale by the time the deck is presented.

Why this crisis exists

It’s not a people problem. It’s a structural one.

The tools in your stack were never designed to talk to each other. Stripe doesn’t know about Salesforce. Intercom doesn’t know about Segment. Your product database doesn’t know about any of them. Each tool is excellent at its specific job and completely blind to everything else.

At the seed stage, a founder can hold the full picture in their head. At $3M+ ARR, no single person can. The business has outgrown the manual data coordination that got you this far, but hasn’t yet built the infrastructure to replace it.

This is the reporting crisis. The gap between the data you need to make decisions and your ability to access it reliably.

The three common fixes (and their trade-offs)

Fix 1: Hire a data team

The conventional approach. Hire a data or GTM engineer, set up a data warehouse, build ETL pipelines, create dashboards, maintain everything. This works — eventually. But it takes 3–6 months to get the first reliable reporting, costs $150K–$300K per year, and the person you hire will spend most of their time on low-leverage data pulls rather than strategic work.

Best for: Companies planning to build a large data organisation over time and comfortable with the timeline and cost.

Fix 2: Buy a BI tool

Set up Looker, Metabase, or Hex. Connect it to a data warehouse. Build dashboards for each metric. This is cheaper than a full hire but still requires someone who can write SQL, design data models, and maintain pipelines when schemas change. A BI tool without a person to run it is shelfware.

Best for: Companies that already have a data warehouse and at least one technically proficient person to build and maintain dashboards.

Fix 3: Use AI to connect the dots

This is the approach Eru takes. Instead of building a data warehouse and hiring someone to query it, Eru connects directly to your tools — billing, CRM, support, product analytics, databases — through read-only integrations. The AI agent maps how your data relates across systems and surfaces the metrics, churn signals, and expansion opportunities that matter.

No warehouse. No SQL. No pipelines. No hire. Setup takes minutes, not months.

Best for: Scale-ups at $3M–$10M ARR who need reliable revenue intelligence now, without the cost and timeline of building a data team.

What life looks like after the crisis

Once your data is connected, the daily experience changes:

For founders and COOs: You open one view and see ARR, NRR, GRR, churn rate, expansion revenue, and pipeline health — all pulled from live data. No more asking someone to pull a number. No more arguing about which spreadsheet is right. You see everything, how it connects, and where to focus.

For Heads of RevOps: Ad-hoc data requests drop dramatically. Metrics are self-serve. You spend time on strategy — improving processes, optimising the funnel, building playbooks — instead of pulling data.

For VP of Finance: Board prep goes from a week of fire drills to reviewing a live dashboard. Investor questions get answered in real time. The numbers reconcile because they’re pulled from the same connected source.

For CS leaders: Churn risk is visible before it happens. Expansion opportunities surface automatically. Your team works proactively instead of reactively.

How to get through it fast

If you’re in the reporting crisis right now, here’s the fastest path out:

This week: Audit how many tools hold customer data. List every source of truth for MRR, churn, usage, and support. Note where they disagree.

Next week: Decide on your approach — hire, BI tool, or AI platform. If you choose Eru, connect your tools and have live metrics within an hour.

This month: Establish your single source of truth for NRR, GRR, and churn. Stop maintaining competing spreadsheets.

This quarter: Use the visibility to act — save accounts showing churn signals, expand accounts showing growth signals, and go into your board meeting with numbers you trust.

The reporting crisis is a stage, not a permanent condition. The companies that get through it fast unlock the data-driven decision-making that makes the next stage of growth possible.

Book a free churn audit to see what your data looks like when it’s actually connected.

Book a churn audit →